[Freepats] has `cheating' been considered?

[Jonas Koelker]

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.bolignet-aarhus.dk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
"info for details.

Content preview:  On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:17:38AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:> On Tuesday 08
 August 2006 01:58, Jonas Koelker wrote:> I'd go along with "some sound is better
 than no sound" argument.> > http://freepats.opensrc.org/freepats/crude.cfg>
 Perhaps if you

Content analysis details:   (3,81 points, 3,00 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2,8 USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT    To: username at front of subject
-0,6 BAYES_01               Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 10%
 0,5 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
-0,5 SMILEY                 Contains one or more Smileys
 0,0 NO_RDNS2               Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
 1,0 MR_DIFF_MID            
 0,6 J_CHICKENPOX_63        

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Jonas Koelker <jonaskoelker at gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Freepats] has `cheating' been considered?
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:41:22 +0200
Size: 2386
Url: http://renta.net/pipermail/freepats/attachments/20060807/e5165a01/attachment.eml