[Freepats] has `cheating' been considered?

[Jonas Koelker]

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.bolignet-aarhus.dk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
"info for details.

Content preview:  On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:28:00PM +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:> On 8/7/06,
 Jonas Koelker <jonaskoelker at gnu.org> wrote:> > [discusses uses `wrong' sounds
 to compensate]> [highlights a use case for really high-quality samples]> >each
 instrument it

Content analysis details:   (6,85 points, 3,00 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2,8 USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT    To: username at front of subject
 2,4 BAYES_80               Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 90%
 0,5 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
-0,5 SMILEY                 Contains one or more Smileys
 0,0 NO_RDNS2               Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
 1,0 MR_DIFF_MID            
 0,6 J_CHICKENPOX_31        

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Jonas Koelker <jonaskoelker at gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Freepats] has `cheating' been considered?
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:03:42 +0200
Size: 3623
Url: http://renta.net/pipermail/freepats/attachments/20060807/f0273956/attachment.eml